Questions Art Art are the products of human creativity ; The creation of beautiful or significant things.
That a representative of the heartland of Federalism could speak in such positive terms of the visit by a Southern president whose decisive election had marked not only a sweeping Republican victory but also the demise of the national Federalist Party was dramatic testimony that former foes were inclined to put aside the sectional and political differences of the past.
James Monroe, oil sketch by E. Library of Congress, Washington, D. Abetting the mood of nationalism was the foreign policy of the United States after the war.
The Monroe Doctrineactually a few phrases inserted in a long presidential message, declared that the United States would not become involved in European affairs and would not accept European interference in the Americas; its immediate effect on other nations was slight, and that on its own citizenry was impossible to gauge, yet its self-assured tone in warning off the Old World from the New reflected well the nationalist mood that swept the country.
Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden promoted nationalism by strengthening Congress and national power at the expense of the states.
The readiness of Southern Jeffersonians—former strict constructionists—to support such a measure indicates, too, an amazing degree of nationalist feeling.
National disunity For all the signs of national unity and feelings of oneness, equally convincing evidence points in the opposite direction. The growth of the West, encouraged by the conquest of Indian lands during the War ofwas by no means regarded as an unmixed blessing.
Eastern conservatives sought to keep land prices high; speculative interests opposed a policy that would be advantageous to poor squatters; politicians feared a change in the sectional balance of power; and businessmen were wary of a new section with interests unlike their own.
European visitors testified that, even during the so-called Era of Good FeelingsAmericans characteristically expressed scorn for their countrymen in sections other than their own.
Economic hardship, especially the financial panic ofalso created disunity. The causes of the panic were complex, but its greatest effect was clearly the tendency of its victims to blame it on one or another hostile or malevolent interest—whether the second Bank of the United States, Eastern capitalists, selfish speculators, or perfidious politicians—each charge expressing the bad feeling that existed side by side with the good.
If harmony seemed to reign on the level of national political parties, disharmony prevailed within the states. In the early 19th-century United States, local and state politics were typically waged less on behalf of great issues than for petty gain. That the goals of politics were often sordid did not mean that political contests were bland.
In every section, state factions led by shrewd men waged bitter political warfare to attain or entrench themselves in power.
The most dramatic manifestation of national division was the political struggle over slaveryparticularly over its spread into new territories. The Missouri Compromise of eased the threat of further disunity, at least for the time being.
The sectional balance between the states was preserved: Yet this compromise did not end the crisis but only postponed it.
The determination by Northern and Southern senators not to be outnumbered by one another suggests that the people continued to believe in the conflicting interests of the various great geographic sections. The weight of evidence indicates that the decade after the Battle of New Orleans was not an era of good feelings so much as one of mixed feelings.
The economy The American economy expanded and matured at a remarkable rate in the decades after the War of The corporate form thrived in an era of booming capital requirements, and older and simpler forms of attracting investment capital were rendered obsolete.
Commerce became increasingly specialized, the division of labour in the disposal of goods for sale matching the increasingly sophisticated division of labour that had come to characterize production.
Edward Pessen The management of the growing economy was inseparable from political conflict in the emerging United States. At the start the issue was between agrarians represented by Jeffersonian Republicans wanting a decentralized system of easy credit and an investing community looking for stability and profit in financial markets.
This latter group, championed by Hamilton and the Federalists, won the first round with the establishment of the first Bank of the United Statesjointly owned by the government and private stockholders.
Its charter expired inand the financial chaos that hindered procurement and mobilization during the ensuing War of demonstrated the importance of such centralization.“was the theme that the differences between biblical literalists and mainstream scientists are minor.
They are not minor; they are poles apart.
This is not to say that science and religion are incompatible; many scientists believe in some kind of higher power, and many religious people accept the idea of .
torosgazete.com is the place to go to get the answers you need and to ask the questions you want. This webpage is for Dr. Wheeler's literature students, and it offers introductory survey information concerning the literature of classical China, classical Rome, classical Greece, the Bible as Literature, medieval literature, Renaissance literature, and genre studies.
The Education of Henry Adams is on my list of books to re-read. I first read it as a senior undergrad in the ''76 academic year at the University of Illinois.
It was an introductory political theory course/5. Bibliography of Social Science History. Joseph Hayim Abraham Uncle of Isaac Hai (Jack) Jacob, AFRICA AND WORLD HISTORY: A FORUM.
THANKFULLY, HISTORIANS HAVE COME A LONG WAY from the late Hugh Trevor-Roper’s dismissive barb made in “Perhaps in the future there will be some African history to teach.